The procurement question
You're sourcing a core material for vacuum insulation panels (VIPs) — refrigerator walls, cold-chain shipping containers, building envelope retrofit, pharma cold-chain logistics. Standard fumed silica is the historical default. Aerogel powder is the newer option, 30-40% more expensive per kg. Is the upgrade worth it?
Short answer: yes, but only if you understand the failure mode you're optimising against.
What VIPs actually do
A vacuum insulation panel is a vacuum-sealed laminate envelope containing a porous core material. The vacuum suppresses gas-phase conduction (the Knudsen effect), achieving thermal conductivity as low as 0.004-0.005 W/m·K — five times better than fibreglass and ten times better than polyurethane foam.
The core material's job is to:
- Maintain pore structure under atmospheric pressure once vacuum is pulled (collapse = failure)
- Allow vacuum to penetrate during the pumping step (closed pores = incomplete vacuum)
- Resist water adsorption during sealing and service (water = back-pressure)
- Retain performance if the vacuum gradually fails over decades
The four failure modes (where aerogel and fumed silica diverge)
Mode 1 — Initial thermal conductivity in vacuum. Aerogel-filled VIPs reach 0.004-0.005 W/m·K. Fumed-silica-filled VIPs reach 0.005-0.007 W/m·K. Both are excellent; aerogel has a small edge.
Mode 2 — Vacuum-pumping integrity. Here's where the question gets interesting. Vacuum pumping requires gas molecules to escape through the core pore network. Fumed silica has tighter aggregate-aggregate gaps (~10-50 nm), which makes pumping slower and risks trapped gas pockets. Aerogel powder AP-200 (20-80 μm particle size) has both internal nanoporosity AND inter-particle macroporosity, which dramatically improves the gas escape path. This is why aerogel-filled VIPs reach lower terminal pressure (~10⁻³ mbar vs 10⁻¹ mbar for fumed silica).
Mode 3 — Water re-adsorption during sealing. If the core absorbs even 0.5% moisture between drying and sealing, the resulting vapour pressure raises internal vacuum pressure during service. Fumed silica is hygroscopic (re-adsorbs 2-3% within 24 hr of drying); aerogel powder with HMDS hydrophobic treatment stays below 0.5% indefinitely. This is the single biggest driver of panel-to-panel failure variability in VIP manufacturing.
Mode 4 — Failed-vacuum performance. Over 15-25 years, all VIPs slowly lose vacuum due to laminate-envelope gas permeation. The critical question becomes: how does the panel perform after vacuum has failed?
| Core material | Vacuum thermal cond. (W/m·K) | Failed-vacuum thermal cond. (W/m·K) | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerogel powder (MEGEL AP-200) | 0.004-0.005 | 0.018-0.020 | 4-5× |
| Fumed silica (Aerosil 200 etc.) | 0.005-0.007 | 0.030-0.040 | 5-8× |
| PU foam (standard) | 0.005-0.008 | 0.022-0.027 | 3-4× |
The math: a refrigerator wall designed around 0.005 W/m·K core might still meet energy regulations at 0.018 W/m·K (aerogel failed) but fail at 0.040 W/m·K (fumed silica failed). Aerogel-filled VIPs maintain useful insulation in the failed state. Fumed-silica VIPs do not. This is the core procurement justification.
Why MEGEL AP-200 specifically
Of the three particle size grades:
- AP-100 (10-60 μm): too fine for VIP — internal porosity too small to evacuate efficiently
- AP-200 (20-80 μm): the sweet spot — internal nanopores + macroporous inter-particle gaps
- AP-300 (50-200 μm): too coarse — particle migration during transport can damage the laminate envelope
Use AP-200 with a 99%+ purity moisture content (Karl Fischer ≤0.5%) at sealing.
Formulation protocol
- Pre-dry the aerogel powder at 105°C for 24 hr, then store under nitrogen blanket
- Bag fill to target 80-100 kg/m³ packed density inside the laminate envelope
- Vacuum-seal in a multi-step process: rough vacuum (10⁻¹ mbar) → high vacuum (10⁻³ mbar) → seal under vacuum
- Edge-seal verification — the long-term failure mode is laminate edge degradation; use 5+ mm seal width
- Validate — test thermal conductivity at 25°C immediately and after 30 days storage (rapid gas re-entry indicates seal failure)
Final panel density 200-250 kg/m³ (including laminate). Thickness 8-30 mm depending on application.
Comparison vs Aspen Cryogel
Aspen Cryogel Z is the established reference for cryogenic VIPs (LNG storage, deep-cold pharma). It's a fibre-reinforced aerogel blanket form, not a powder. Functional differences:
| Property | Aspen Cryogel Z (blanket) | MEGEL AP-200 (powder) |
|---|---|---|
| Form | Fibre-reinforced sheet | Free-flowing powder |
| Internal vacuum cond. | 0.012 W/m·K (cryogenic) | 0.005 W/m·K (typical) |
| Service temperature | −200 to +200°C | −40 to +650°C |
| Best for | Cryogenic LNG / deep-cold | Refrigerator / cold-chain |
| Cost per m² | Higher (reinforcement + blanket process) | Lower (powder fill) |
For refrigerator and cold-chain VIPs at non-cryogenic temperatures, MEGEL AP-200 is the correct choice. For cryogenic LNG containment, Aspen Cryogel Z's robust mechanical form factor wins.
Procurement and lead time
MOQ: 50 kg (10 × 5 kg bags or 4 × 15 kg drums). Lead time 3-5 weeks FOB Shanghai. CoA per batch covers bulk density, BET surface area (700-900 m²/g), thermal conductivity at 25°C, hydrophobicity, particle size distribution, Karl Fischer water content. For pre-qualification, request a 5 kg sample with 30-day thermal conductivity baseline data.
FAQ
How long do aerogel-filled VIPs last in real installation?
15-25 years typical in protected installation (refrigerator walls, building envelope panels). Performance loss is gradual ~1-3% per year due to slow gas permeation. The aerogel-filled panel hits 0.018 W/m·K (acceptable) in the failed-vacuum state; the fumed-silica panel hits 0.040 W/m·K (below most regulatory minimum). This is why aerogel-filled VIPs win for retrofit applications where panel replacement isn't easy.
Can MEGEL AP-200 be combined with fibreglass or fumed silica for cost reduction?
Yes — common formulations use 60-70% AP-200 + 30-40% fumed silica (lower-cost filler). The fumed silica reduces material cost but partially restores the failed-vacuum failure mode. Run a 30-day thermal conductivity test on the blend before committing to production. For cost-no-object premium VIPs, use 100% AP-200.
What's the proper moisture-control protocol?
Pre-dry at 105°C for 24 hours under inert atmosphere. Cool to room temperature under nitrogen blanket. Transfer to sealing equipment under closed system. Sealed Karl Fischer water content ≤0.5%. The hydrophobic HMDS surface treatment on MEGEL AP-200 means moisture re-adsorption is far slower than untreated aerogel, but is not zero — full protocol still required.
Related
- MEGEL® Silica Aerogel Hub — full grade lineup including felt forms for non-VIP insulation
- HJSIL® Fumed Silica Hub — for blended VIP core formulations
- Aerogel in EV Battery Thermal Runaway Barriers — related application of similar chemistry
- Aspen Cryogel Z — comparable reference brand (external)
Talk to our application chemists
Send an inquiry — we reply within 24 hours with COA, MSDS, and a sample plan.
Send an inquiry